11/59   Leave a comment

11/59.

Advertisements

Posted April 15, 2013 by theoleperfesser in Uncategorized

11/59   Leave a comment

Storm clouds have gathered and are threatening, “We the people of the United States of America”, with a never before seen, insidious attack  on “free men”.  Its magnitude is so great because never before in the history of mankind has there ever been such a enormous collection of free men as now assembles in the United States of America nor the enemy in greater force! This is because there has never existed, in man’s history, so many “free men” gathered under a single government.  Will America survive? NO!, not unless We, HIS people, act with the speed of light, asking HIM  (II Ch. 7:14) to stop the “storm”.

In the history of man and his governments, through the ages, we find three distinct forms of government or non-government and a variation on the “theme” of each basic for two of the.  The other brooks no variations.  It is not a matter of a  left versus right/liberal versus conservative, continuum.  Current politicians have us believing this is a battle between the right and the left.  Hog wash and sheep-dip!  Both sides seek the same thing: power resulting in the complete and total control of men, abolishing  those “unalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” with which every life man, woman or child, living or dead has been endowed by the CREATOR! – Not by a political party, not a military/industrial complex, (socialism), or a bunch of self-apppointed radical revolutionaries, (communism). BY THE CREATOR!!  It is ALL ABOUT WHO IS GOING TO TELL YOU WHAT TO DO;  CONTROL YOU AND YOUR EVET ACTION1

Did you know that there are, in existence at this moment, under the authority of the Department of Home Security, rules and regulations determining energy usage you must meet in the construction of a new church building?  Did you know that if you want to sell your home, you may have to spend hundreds or even thousands of dollars to bring it up the the DHP’s energy code before you can sell it? Did you know that we now have a serum that can make you sterile?  Did you know that YOU have to sign a release to gain access to YOUR medical records?  Did you know that doctors may be required to limit the length of your office visit to fifteen minutes and that he/she must maintain a full daily schedule of appointments.  A thought, wonder how long it will be before police are forced to carry mal-practice insurance?

The solution is with God’s “people who are called by HIS NAME, IF THEY WILL HUMBLE THEMSELVES”, recognize THAT ALL THINGS TURN BY HIS POWER AND WILL; “if they will pray”,   that’s more than mouthing some words, “if they wilL TURN FROM THEIR WICKED WAYS”, quit doing things the world’s way, and “IF THEY WILL SEEK MY FACE, starting listening to and following HIM, “THEN I WILL HEAR . .  I WILL FORGIVE THRIR SINS, AND I WILL HEAL THEIR LAND!”  The Word of the Lord to the ear of Zechariah was, “NOT BY MIGHT NOR BY POWER, BUT BY MY SPIRIT, says the LORD OF HOSTS”!  

Posted April 15, 2013 by theoleperfesser in Uncategorized

“WHAT IF?”   Leave a comment

“WHAT IF . . .”                                                                                                                                                                                                               

 

WE HAVE BEEN TOLD “STRONG GUN CONTROL IS NEEDED, TO PREVENT VIOLENCE AND CRIME. DESIRABLE, EVEN IF IT WOULD ONLY SAVE ONE LIFE . . ..”,  A VERY NOBLE AND COMPASSIONATE SENTIMENT.  IT WOULD WARRANT SERIOUS CONSIDERATION, BY “WE THE PEOPLE”, IF THIS PRINCIPLE WERE APPLIED IN OTHER AREAS WHERE INANIMATE ITEMS WERE CONTROLLED TO THE SAME SAME COMPARABLE DEGREE, SOME EXAMPLES:

 

“WHAT IF,  THE SPEED  OF AUTOMOBILES WAS LIMITED, TO 35 MILES AN HOUR, SINCE, WE ARE TOLD, “SPEED KILLS”? DOES IT NOT DESERVE THE SAME STRICT RULES FOR SALE AND PURCHASE OF A CAR AS IS NOW REQUIRED FOR SALE OR PURCHASE OF A FIREARM? NOW, WE ARE BEING ASKED TO CONSIDER “SAVE ONE LIFE” AS A VIABLE ARGUMENT FOR GUN CONTROL.

 

“WHAT IF”, SALE AND OWNERSHIP OF A HAMMER WAS SUBJECTED TO THE SAME STRINGENT REGULATIONS BEING SUGGESTED TO, “SAVE ONE LIFE”, BEING PUT FORTH FOR GUN CONTROL?  I, PERSONALLY, KNOW THAT SUCH CONTROLS WOULD HAVE SAVED TWO LIVES; THAT OF MY FATHER AND A FELLOW WORKER, BOTH BEATEN TO DEATH, BY A DRUGGIE, USING A HAMMER.

 

“WHAT IF”, DOCTORS WERE DENIED THE USE OF THE TOOLS  OF THEIR TRADE, OR AT LEAST SUBJECTED TO STRINGENT CONTROLS, SINCE THERE HAS BEEN A MAJOR LOSS OF LIVES DUE TO  ACCIDENTS BY PHYSICIANS IN TREATING PATIENTS?  APPARENTLY MORE THAN “ONE LIFE” WOULD HAVE BEEN SAVED.

 

“WHAT IF”, STRICT LAWS CONCERNING MANUFACTURE, SALE AND POSSESSION OF ALCOHOL  AND DRUGS WERE PASSED AND ENFORCED AT THE CURRENT LEVEL AS AREN PRESENTLY IN PLACE REGARDING THE SALE AND OWNERSHIP OF GUNS? WOULD “ONE LIFE” HAVE BEEN SAVED?

 

“WHAT IF”, YOU HAD TO FILL OUT AN INFORMATION SHEET REQUIRING REVELATION OF YOUR CITIZENSHIP, PLACE AND DATE OF BIRTH, VARIOUS OTHER QUESTIONS REGARDING YOU PERSON AND CHARACTER AND THEN UNDERGO A “BACK-GROUND CHECK” IN ORDER TO UAVE AN ABORTION? WOULD SUCH A PROCEDURE HAVE SAVED “ONE LIFE” OUT OF THE OVER FIFTY MILLION PRE-BIRTH DEATHS, SONCE ROE VS WADE?

 

“WHAT IF”, WE HAD THE UNCOMMON, “COMMON SENSE” TO SEE THAT INANIMATE THINGS DON’T TAKE “ONE LIFE”, OR MULTIPLE LIVES, IT IS PEOPLE, A SEGENT OF “WE THE PEOPLE” THAT KILLS OTHER PEOPLE.  HAVE THE DECENCY AND THE HONESTY TO PUT THE BLAME WHERE IT BELONGS: ON PEOPLE MISUSING THINGS TO TAKE LIFE FROM OTHER PEOPLE. LET EACH OF US BE RESPONSIBLE AND ACCOUNTABLE CITIZENS, IN OUR OWN PERSON AND WHO IN A RESPONSIBLE MANNER, PUNISH THE PERPETRATORS OF CRIMINAL ACTS.

Posted February 6, 2013 by theoleperfesser in Uncategorized

A NEW YEAR’S RESOLUTION FOR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS FROM THE TOP TO THE BOTTOM – FROM PRESIDENCY TO THE DOG CATCHER   Leave a comment

A NEW YEAR’S RESOLUTION FOR GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS FROM THE TOP TO THE BOTTOM FROM PRESIDENCY TO THE LOWEST DOG CATCHER

“I, HEREBY RESOLVE AND SOLEMNLY PROMISE TO UPHOLD, IN EACH AND EVERY SINGLE ACTION I TAKE, AS AN ELECTED OR APPOINTED OFFICIAL OF ANY AND EVERY FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY OR MUNICIPALITY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THAT I WILL UPHOLD THE THREE DOCUMENTS ON WHICH THESE UNTED STATES OF AMERICA WERE FOUNDED: NAMELY, THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATE OF AMERICA AND THE BIBLE. I MAKE THIS RESOLUTION WITHOUT RESERVATION,
OR WITH ANY INTENT TO MISLEAD, OR DEFRAUD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, BY ANY METHOD OF MIS-DIRECTING THEM BY OUTRIGHT LIES, OR SUBTERFUGE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DELIBERATE MIS-QUOTES AND HALF-TRUTHS.

I, FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE, THAT I REGARD EACH OF THE FORENAMED DOCUMENTS AS INVIOLATE, ESPECIALLY AS TO THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE AND THE BIBLE. THE CONSTITUTION IS “LIVING” IN THE SENSE THAT IT HAS A SELF-INCLUDED METHOD OF AMEND-MENT, WHEREBY IT MAY BE AMENDED, THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE A DICTATORIAL MIS-USE OF EXECUTIVE ORDERS , AS SOME HAVE PREVIOUSLY DONE.

I, FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE, THAT THERE ARE THOSE WHO DENY AND REJECT THE HISTORICAL FACT THAT THE BIBLE IS FREQUENTLY REFERENCED IN THE HISTORICAL DOCUMENTS AND DOCUMENTATION OF THE FOUNDING OR BY THE FOUNDERS OF THESE UNITED STATES AND THAT IT SERVED A VITAL ROLE IN THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NATION.

I REGARD THE DENIALS AND REJECTIONS OF THE BIBLE’S ESSENTIAL ROLE INTHE FOUNDING OUR THE UNITED STATES AS THE ORIGINATING IN ONE OF TWO PLACES; A MIS-PLACED SENSE OF NOT WISHING TO OFFEND THOSE WHO DO NOT ACCEPT THE BIBLE AS THE WORD OF GOD, WHICH BELIEF HAS NOT ONE BIT OF RELEVANCE TO THE HISTORICAL FACTS; OR AN IGNORANCE OF THE ACTUAL NEXUS FROM WHICH THE NATION CAME. THE CONCERN, AT THIS POINT IS NOT A MATTER OF ONE’S PERSONAL EVALUATION OF THE BIBLE, JUST AN ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THAT IT PLAYED A SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN THE HISTORY OF AMERICA.

IN THE LATER CASE, IF THIS IGNORANCE IS THE RESULT OF AN INDIVIDUAL’S CARELESS LACK OF CONCERN OR INTEREST AS TO OUR COUNTRY‘ S ORIGIN AND OF THE ROLE THAT THEY AS INDIVIDUALS PLAY IN THE KIND OF COUNTRY WE LIVE IF, I SAY ‘SHAME OF YOU’. IF THIS IGNORANCE IS THE REST OF SHODDY HISTORY TEACHING, WHICH LIMITS HISTORY TO NAMES , DATES AND PLACES, INSTEAD OF THE EVENTS, THEIR IMPORTANCE IN THE MOMENT AND RELEVANCE TO TODAY, ‘SHAME ON THEM’, AS WELL AS YOU FOR SUCH CARELESS INDIFFERENCE TO WHAT MADE US THE GREATEST NATION IN HISTORY; THE SACRIFICES OF BLOOD, SEAT AND TEARS, OF UN-NAMED AND UN-REMEMBERED CITIZENS THAT HAVE GIVEN TO US BLESSINGS UNEQUALED IN HISTORY.

I, FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE, THAT I REGARD ANY INDIVIDUAL, ENTRUSTED WITH ANY OFFICE IN THESE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OR ANY CITIZEN WHO WOULD REUSE TO MAKE THIS RESOLUTION UNWORTHY OF THE HONOR OS SERVING AND BEING A PART OF THIS GREAT, EXCEPTIONAL NATION.”

THE oleperfesser HAS BUT ONE QUESTION FOR YOU MR/MRS/MS, OR WHATEVER DESIGNATION BY WHICH AYOU WISH TO IDENTIFY YOURSELF, THAT IS; “ARE YOU A PATRIOTIC AMERICA TO THE POINT OF MAKING AND KEEPING THIS RESOLUTION?, IF NOT ARE YOU ENOUGH OF A PATRIOTIC AMERICAN TO RESIGN YOUR OFFICE TO ANOTHER WHO IS AND GO HOME AND DO WHATEVER?”

Posted December 26, 2012 by theoleperfesser in Uncategorized

Tagged with ,

DARE YOU CALL IT TREASON? AND SWORE AN OATH TO “PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES”. SOME HISTORICAL RECORDS INDICATE THE SWEARING IN WAS FLAWED AND WAS RE-ADMINISTERED THE FOLLOWING EVENING. I HAVE SEEN SOURCES THAT THE OATH WAS TAKEN WITH HIS HAND ON THE KORAN, NOT THE BIBLE. I AM SOMEWHAT PUZZLED THAT A MAN PROCLAIMING HIMSELF A “CHRISTIAN”, SOME OF THE TIME, WOULD NOT USE THE BIBLE FOR SUCH A SIGNIFICANT EVENT. AT THIS POINT IN TIME, THAT MAN, HIS SECRETARY OF STATE, WIFE OF A FORMER PRESIDENT, AND WHO KNOWS WHAT OTHER MEMBERS OF HIS ADMINISTRATION ARE INVOLVED IN DRAFTING PEACE TREATIES OR AGREEMENTS WITH FOREIGN NATIONS UNDER THE GUISE OF THE UNITEDANTIAMERICAN NATIONS, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE U.N., THAT BY-PASS THE FIRST AND SECOND AMENDMENTS TO THAT CONSTITUTION HE SWORE TO PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND. IN CASE YOU HAVE SPENT YOUR LIFE IN FOLLYWOOD OR SHANGRI-LA, YOU KNOW THE FIRST AMENDMENT SECURES FREE SPEECH. ONE OF THE ATTACKS ON THIS AMENDMENT DEALS WITH A PROPOSED TAX ON YOUR USE OF THE INTERNET. REPORTS ARE IT WILL COST AS MUCH AS ONE DOLLAR AND A HLAF EACH USE OF THAT SERVICE. I SUBMIT, SUCH A CHARGE IS NOTHING MORE THAN A TAX, AND ONE THAT WOULD IMPACT THE MIDDLE CLASS TO WHOM HE PROMISED NO TAX INCREASES. I SUPPOSE YOU COULD TRY TO DEFINE WHAT “IS”, “IS” AGAIN. THAT, WOULD JUSTIFY THE TAX BY ASSURING US IT IS NOT “YOU TUBE”, “FACE BOOK”, “TWITTER” AND ALL THE OTHER USES THE INTERNET PROVIDES, WHAT DO YOU THINK IT WOULD COST YOU TO CONTINUE TO USE THE INTERNET? UNDERSTAND, THIS ATTACK ON OUR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS WILL BY-PASS CONGRESS AND “WE THE “PEOPLE”, IF IT IS CONSUMMATED. IS THIS WHAT IS MEANT BY, “PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION? “BYE, BYE” FREE SPEECH, “SEE YA LATER FIRST AMENDMENT”. THE SAME SUBTERFUGE IS BEING EMPLOYED TO STRIP US OF OUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHT. THE UNITEDANTIAMERICAN NATIONS ARE SEEKING WORLD TREATIES DICTATING, LIMITING, OR ELIMINATING THE USE AND OWNERSHIP OF FIREARMS. ARE YOU A LITTLE CONFUSED BY THE STATEMENT, “GUNS KILL PEOPLE” AND YET YOU NEVER HEAR OF ANYONE BEING KILLED AT A GUN SHOW, NOT EVEN ACCIDENTALLY. HAVE YOU EVER WONDERED WHY SO MANY OF THE MASS-SHOOTING OCCUR IN “GUN-FREE” AREAS; OR WHY THERE ARE SO MANY GUN CRIMES IN THOSE AREAS WITH THE MOST RIGID AND STRICT GUN LAWS? CREDENCE HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE CHARGE THAT SUCH UNCONSTITUTIONAL TREATIES ARE BEING HAMMERED OUT WHEN, JUST LAST NIGHT, THE LEADER OF THIS CONSTITUTIONAL COMMITTEE CAME OUT FOR BANNING CERTAIN TYPES OF FIRE ARMS. THE SECOND AMENDMENT PROVIDES NO LISTS OF ALLOWED OR DISALLOWED WEAPONS. THOMAS JEFFERSON SAID, THE CITIZENRY SHOULD BE ARMED SO AS TO PROTECT ITSELF FROM CORRUPT GOVERNMENT. COME TO THINK OF IT, MAYBE THE QUESTION OF THE TITLE OF THIS, LITTLE BIT A’WONDERIN’ ,MIGHT BETTER BE, “DO WE DARE NOT TO CALL IT TREASON?”. theoleperfesser   Leave a comment

DARE YOU CALL IT TREASON?

NEARLY FOUR YEARS AGO A MAN STOOD, AND SWORE AN OATH TO “PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES”. SOME HISTORICAL RECORDS INDICATE THE SWEARING IN WAS FLAWED AND WAS RE-ADMINISTERED THE FOLLOWING EVENING.

I HAVE SEEN SOURCES THAT THE OATH WAS TAKEN WITH HIS HAND ON THE KORAN, NOT THE BIBLE. I AM SOMEWHAT PUZZLED THAT A MAN PROCLAIMING HIMSELF A “CHRISTIAN”, SOME OF THE TIME, WOULD NOT USE THE BIBLE FOR SUCH A SIGNIFICANT EVENT.

AT THIS POINT IN TIME, THAT MAN, HIS SECRETARY OF STATE, WIFE OF A FORMER PRESIDENT, AND WHO KNOWS WHAT OTHER MEMBERS OF HIS ADMINISTRATION ARE INVOLVED IN DRAFTING PEACE TREATIES OR AGREEMENTS WITH FOREIGN NATIONS UNDER THE GUISE OF THE UNITEDANTIAMERICAN NATIONS, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE U.N., THAT BY-PASS THE FIRST AND SECOND AMENDMENTS TO THAT CONSTITUTION HE SWORE TO PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND.

IN CASE YOU HAVE SPENT YOUR LIFE IN FOLLYWOOD OR SHANGRI-LA, YOU KNOW THE FIRST AMENDMENT SECURES FREE SPEECH. ONE OF THE ATTACKS ON THIS AMENDMENT DEALS WITH A PROPOSED TAX ON YOUR USE OF THE INTERNET. REPORTS ARE IT WILL COST AS MUCH AS ONE DOLLAR AND A HLAF EACH USE OF THAT SERVICE.

I SUBMIT, SUCH A CHARGE IS NOTHING MORE THAN A TAX, AND ONE THAT WOULD IMPACT THE MIDDLE CLASS TO WHOM HE PROMISED NO TAX INCREASES. I SUPPOSE YOU COULD TRY TO DEFINE WHAT “IS”, “IS” AGAIN.
THAT, WOULD JUSTIFY THE TAX BY ASSURING US IT IS NOT “YOU TUBE”, “FACE BOOK”, “TWITTER” AND ALL THE OTHER USES THE INTERNET PROVIDES, WHAT DO YOU THINK IT WOULD COST YOU TO CONTINUE TO USE THE INTERNET?

UNDERSTAND, THIS ATTACK ON OUR FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS WILL BY-PASS CONGRESS AND “WE THE “PEOPLE”, IF IT IS CONSUMMATED. IS THIS WHAT IS MEANT BY, “PRESERVE, PROTECT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION? “BYE, BYE” FREE SPEECH, “SEE YA LATER FIRST AMENDMENT”.

THE SAME SUBTERFUGE IS BEING EMPLOYED TO STRIP US OF OUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHT. THE UNITEDANTIAMERICAN NATIONS ARE SEEKING WORLD TREATIES DICTATING, LIMITING, OR ELIMINATING THE USE AND OWNERSHIP OF FIREARMS. ARE YOU A LITTLE CONFUSED BY THE STATEMENT, “GUNS KILL PEOPLE” AND YET YOU NEVER HEAR OF ANYONE BEING KILLED AT A GUN SHOW, NOT EVEN ACCIDENTALLY.

HAVE YOU EVER WONDERED WHY SO MANY OF THE MASS-SHOOTING OCCUR IN “GUN-FREE” AREAS; OR WHY THERE ARE SO MANY GUN CRIMES IN THOSE AREAS WITH THE MOST RIGID AND STRICT GUN LAWS?

CREDENCE HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THE CHARGE THAT SUCH UNCONSTITUTIONAL TREATIES ARE BEING HAMMERED OUT WHEN, JUST LAST NIGHT, THE LEADER OF THIS CONSTITUTIONAL COMMITTEE CAME OUT FOR BANNING CERTAIN TYPES OF FIRE ARMS. THE SECOND AMENDMENT PROVIDES NO LISTS OF ALLOWED OR DISALLOWED WEAPONS. THOMAS JEFFERSON SAID, THE CITIZENRY SHOULD BE ARMED SO AS TO PROTECT ITSELF FROM CORRUPT GOVERNMENT.

COME TO THINK OF IT, MAYBE THE QUESTION OF THE TITLE OF THIS, LITTLE BIT A’WONDERIN’ ,MIGHT BETTER BE, “DO WE DARE NOT TO CALL IT TREASON?”.

theoleperfesser

Posted October 18, 2012 by theoleperfesser in Uncategorized

A SECOND OPEN LETTER   Leave a comment

A SECOND OPEN LETTER TO THE MAN IN THE WHITE HOUSE

 

Last night, in the first of the Presidential Debates,  you, sir, attacked your opponent on a lack of  details regarding some of his  program proposals.  What audacity and arrogance.  It reminds me of a highway in Kentucky called the, “Double AA”.  It is touted as a shorter way from Cincinnati, to certain places in Ky.  But, it is full of two-lane sections, low speed limits and traffic lights and some small towns.

 

Your complaint that Gov. Romney showed few details reminded, as if I needed reminded, that You, sir,  have yet to reveal, or allow to be revealed the detains of  your education and how a poor individual, like yourself, could get an education at some of the countries “elite” educational institution, which is no cheap; be President of the Harvard Law Review; and a member of the University of  Chicago faculty.  Audacity and arrogance.

 

More troubling is the lack of transparency and detail regarding obamacare.  As you must be aware, sir, that bill establishing obamacare are the “law of the land”, was railroaded through congress without a single republican voting for it, over the objections of a majority of “We the People”, with most of the congress having never read it, and some who had read it complained it would take a lawyer to interpret it.  The bill was passed so we could “know what is in it” , according to you hench-woman, Nancy Pelosi.  On the senate side it was Harry Reid who went along.  All with audacity and arrogance in their disregard of “We the People”, who by the way are for the most part “middle class” people you professed such concern for and determination to protect in last night’s debate.

 

Do you, sir, think  “We the People”  are so stupid we do not see that if you really had our interests at heart you would listen to our voice, instead of treating us like some children who can’t care for themselves, and even worse don’t have a clue to what they need.  I, for one, sir, consider that insulting to me as an individual with two bachelors degrees and three masters, degrees, albeit not one of the “elite” universities out East.  I am 87 years old, have worked hard all my life and am still working; get up every morning thanking God for another day of life to enjoy and a prayer for  His guidance during the day, and the enjoyment He has blessed me with during my life. and you, sir are going to tell me you know what is best for me?  Audacity and arrogance.

 

You, sir, last night of “Freedom”.  Oh, wise leader, how long before you by trickery, secrecy, and back-room conniving with foreign governments, through the U. N. (UnAmerican Nationalism), take away a God-given, Constitutionally guaranteed right.  The right to bear arms, to be armed citizenry, which by the way Thomas Jefferson said was essential in order for “We the People” to protect ourselves from “corrupt government”.

 

One last thought, sir, framed as a question, if , as you claim, you are interested in the “middle class”, why would you burden our children and grandchildren and possibly even another generation, with paying you $400,000 plus,  a year, for the rest of your life so you can to sit in your Lazyboy recliner”.   By, the way, that $400,000 plus a year is ten times was I and many others middle income families have made in a “good” year.  We, who you, sir and your cronies feel need “trickle-down government” to show us what we need don’t complain, we just thank God for our blessings, enjoy our families, friends and lives and pray God will deliver us from not only the “evil one”. but from the audacity and arrogance of  those who thonk they know our needs and are better equipped to provide for us than we do.

 

theoleperfesser

Posted October 4, 2012 by theoleperfesser in Uncategorized

Open Letter To whoever   Leave a comment

To the present occupant of the White House, his Secretary of State, other members of the current Cabinet, the Congress and the Supreme Court, I have the highest regard and respect for the office of “President of the United States”, Secretary of State, Congress and the Supreme Court.  As one of “We the People of the United States of America” I cannot say the same for many of those offices.

 

I am deeply troubled by the disrespect many of these elected and appointed officials show toward “We the People of  the United States of America”, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States of America!

 

Do you, sir, and you fellow-office holders not understand “We the People of the United States of America” are not citizens of some nebulous, imagined world government.

 

To paraphrase a Biblical quote, we are “in the world, but not of the world”.  This relates directly to Christians meaning we live in the world but we, as Christians are NOT participate in activity contrary to our Spiritual Constitution.  In like manner we dwell in the world but we DO NOT participate in the “business” of other nations in the world, NOR are we subject to their interference in the private affairs of “We the People”!

 

You and yours, sir, have NO CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY to impose on “We the People”, the will of people who live in the world, but are not a part of the United States.  In fact many of these countries who seek to regulate my Constitutional right are getting some of my tax money and I have had virtually NO Voice in such expenditures.

 

Is it not true that you and your Sec. of St. for example, are moving toward signing on to a treaty that is designed, in the final analysis, to taking away the freedom granted under the Second Amendment of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”S CONSTITUTION  – the right to bear arms. Such a treaty is not only unConstitutional, but defies reason, as well.

 

Do you, sir, not understand that you and “yours” have no such authority.  You were quite correct when you said, “. . .They cling to their Bibles and guns”.  We cling to our Bibles, is such is our belief and to our guns as our hobby whether hunting or just target shooting.  If that is part of our form of happiness, it is our right to pursue it.  Banning guns, to the citizenry, means those who have no regard for law will still have guns and the rest of the public will be at their pleasure.

 

You, sir, are currently seeking re-election.  Decide, and honestly proclaim whether it is your desire to be re-elected to the office of President of the United States of America or president of a world government.

 

theoleperfesser

Veedersburg, In

 

Posted September 27, 2012 by theoleperfesser in Uncategorized